Oh, it would have been a bit quicker, but my swap partition is also on
the NVME SSD, so it's pretty fast.
For comparison, ages ago, the desktop machine originally had a Sempron
processor and two GB of RAM. It took about 8 hours to stitch a panorama
made from 6MP images.
On 1/13/24 06:27, Maarten Verberne wrote:
if you do not have >64Gb i would try to seperate the images in 2
groups, stitch them first and then stitch the 2 group frames together...
although it means more work for you and might have a quality
degradation, it will probably be quicker if you can keep it within
your available RAM.
Op 13-Jan-24 om 11:11 schreef David W. Jones:
Hmm, I've had Hugin (particularly enblend) consume more than the 64GB
RAM in my laptop when stitching. Probably depends on the sizes of the
source images and the final image. Perhaps the image format, too?
--
David W. Jones
[email protected]
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com
My password is the last 8 digits of π.
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/93219bd4-5b30-4a96-806d-9bb7449b3cbd%40gmail.com.
