thank you Bruno, interesting information! i’m reading that the green channel has more resolution - i wonder how this translates in my case: for my workflow i’m batch developing the raw files of my camera into 16bit tiffs that i then use as input for hugin. to be honest the few times i did compare the partial tiff’s to the hugin mosaic at 1:1 i didn’t notice any detail loss.
On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 1:25:21 PM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, 10:30 Fotis K, wrote: > >> After all these years of using hugin I discovered that I never set the >> option *downscale final pano* from 70% to 100% in the preferenecs. >> >> However I always click *calculate optimal size *right before the final >> stitching. >> > > This 'calculate optimal size' function uses the 70% default. The rationale > is that digital cameras produce redundant pixels due to Bayes sampling in > the CCD, so for most users there is no loss (and the files are half the > size). > > If you are sourcing images from another source: scanning, or the output > from another Hugin project, it might be worth setting it to 100% > > -- > Bruno > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/fad78bba-c550-48c9-a7ff-ef8bfa468430n%40googlegroups.com.
