Hi Alex,
The OMP messages have nothing to do with your images nor the way you
try to stitch them, for sure. They are related to OpenMP, a library for
parallel processing in the CPU (and also GPU) cores. They show us that the
program (enblend, in this case) needs some code updates because OpenMP
evolved and the program uses some function calls that are now obsolete.
About the Dijkstra optimizer and seam-line end point outside of
cost-image, I sometimes -- I think less than before, maybe I perfected my
shooting technique? -- get them. When that happens, enblend may fail and
the output image is automatically erased... In this case, use of masks or
another order of the photos may help to reach a successful stitching.
I have not yet stitched any true mosaic, however I use mosaic mode for
my nadir images and in this case it works very well.
Good luck!
Luís Henrique
Em sáb., 5 de nov. de 2022 às 20:25, Alexander Drecun <
[email protected]> escreveu:
> So I'm not sure if anyone will circle back around to this conversation,
> but I'm hoping someone will have some insight into the issues I've run into
> recently. I was able to successfully stitch a rectilinear mosaic panorama
> out of twenty images using the following method:
>
> - Start with an image in the center of the mosaic anchored for position
> and exposure
> - Add one image on either side of the anchored image
> - Create control points
> - Optimize in the following order
> - TrX
> - TrX + Yaw
> - TrY
> - TrY + Pitch
> - TrZ + Roll
> - Yaw + Pitch + Roll + TrX + TrY + Trz
> - Add one more image on each end
> - Create control points
> - Optimize in same order
> - Repeat until I've reached twenty images
> - Calculate Field of View and adjust slightly to ensure that entire mosaic
> is visible
> - Calculate Optimal Size
> - Panorama Output: exposure corrected, low dynamic range
> - Format: PNG
>
> The stitch was successful, but I received the following notes for almost
> image during the stitching process, and, at the end, "batch was completed
> with errors."
>
> enblend: info: loading next image: Middle Out Strategy
> Test-341_4410095.tif 1/1
> OMP: Info #270: omp_get_nested routine deprecated, please use
> omp_get_max_active_levels instead.
> OMP: Info #270: omp_set_nested routine deprecated, please use
> omp_set_max_active_levels instead.
> OMP: Info #270: omp_set_nested routine deprecated, please use
> omp_set_max_active_levels instead.
> enblend: info: loading next image: Middle Out Strategy
> Test-341_4410096.tif 1/1
> enblend: warning: unable to run Dijkstra optimizer
> enblend: note: seam-line end point outside of cost-image
> enblend: note: contour #1 of 1, segment #1 of 1, vertex #36 of 489
> OMP: Info #270: omp_get_nested routine deprecated, please use
> omp_get_max_active_levels instead.
> OMP: Info #270: omp_set_nested routine deprecated, please use
> omp_set_max_active_levels instead.
> OMP: Info #270: omp_set_nested routine deprecated, please use
> omp_set_max_active_levels instead.
>
> What's a little confusing, however, is that the exact same process results
> in a failed stitch once I try more than twenty images. It has failed at
> thirty, fifty and one hundred images, all while producing a log virtually
> identical to the stitches that succeeded. The twenty image panorama had
> dimensions of 43,671 x 8,923, while the one hundred image panorama would
> have been 196,497 x 11,462.
>
> First question, I guess, is, what do these notes mean? Second, how can I
> correct them?
>
> For reference, I'm using the latest version for OSX, 2021.0.0.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
> On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 2:52:24 PM UTC-7 [email protected]
> wrote:
>
>> All at once is what the UI, I described, displays.
>> It is similar to the UI you know about for a pair of images, but
>> generally more useful.
>> You don't need to sort through the connections between 100 images.
>> Try it and see.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 5:39 PM Alexander Drecun <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm aware of that function but thought it was exclusively comparative,
>>> i.e. you can look at the control points shared by two images and sort those
>>> control points by distance. I've done that with some of my images but
>>> admittedly I'm going to have to gird myself before sorting through the
>>> 4,000+ control points for over 100 images. Unless there's a way to look at
>>> the distance for all of those 4000 control points at once.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 1:15 PM John Fine <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 3:45 PM Alexander Drecun <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hmm ok, I'll go back and take a look. While I haven't gone through all
>>>>> 100 or so images in the panorama, I haven't seen any non-matching points
>>>>> in
>>>>> the control points I've looked at but I'll take a closer look.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That sounds like you don't know about an important bit of Hugin's UI:
>>>>
>>>> Click the view menu.
>>>> Select "Control point table"
>>>> If the Distance column is not already sorted with the largest first,
>>>> click it once or twice until it is sorted largest first.
>>>> Click on any row of the table to jump to reviewing that control point
>>>> within the control points tab.
>>>> It is thus quick and easy to review the worst fitting few control
>>>> points.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
>>>> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CALe0Q_%3DyDMz7EOMVS%2BNMLDiv5NyptCV9h2%2BdU5j9E%2BvDCCQm3w%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CALe0Q_%3DyDMz7EOMVS%2BNMLDiv5NyptCV9h2%2BdU5j9E%2BvDCCQm3w%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
>>> A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
>>> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CABqZK5dKq8OAuGFcTFm6WqwGX2FKWR1%2BS2qr7kFcB8iJr%2Buivw%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CABqZK5dKq8OAuGFcTFm6WqwGX2FKWR1%2BS2qr7kFcB8iJr%2Buivw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
> A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/ef7186f1-1f52-4634-90d8-99637df41818n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/ef7186f1-1f52-4634-90d8-99637df41818n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
--
Luis Henrique Camargo Quiroz
http://luishcq.br.tripod.com - http://www.christusrex.org/www2/cantgreg
http://panoramaslh.net/
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CAEKSoZZZR4%3Dh9VEfLpQeAU-2nC_4_yQ3hPqhWjP%2B7UvrN1au9Q%40mail.gmail.com.
