[image: 202209182331.png] camera never rotated so FOV=0 degree. 在2022年9月18日星期日 UTC+8 23:28:25<黄禄轩> 写道：
> i see. you indeed set a wrong fov for the project. if camera is slide from > one side to the other side without any kind of rotation, fov should be > zero. but you cannot put a zero into it, so a small number for example 0.5 > is ok. i tried blend 768 images took with a microscope, and i used 0.5 for > my project and it is working well. > > 在2022年9月18日星期日 UTC+8 23:19:15<[email protected]> 写道： > >> Perhaps I should have specified that the panorama I'm attempting to >> stitch is sort of a mosaic-style one made up of images that I shot moving >> the camera along a flat plane. I was told that rectilinear is the >> appropriate projection setting for such images. When I change the >> projection to cylindrical or equirectangular, it produces significant >> bulging in the middle of the panorama with thin tails at the edges. The FOV >> of 179 degrees is what Hugin produces when I hit the "calculate field of >> view" button in the Stitcher tab. >> >> I'm also not sure why the output size was so small. That said, I've run >> into this same issue when attempting to output the panorama at "calculate >> optimal size," which is in the area of 4.5 gigapixels. >> >> This is what the Stitcher tab looks like when I select all of three of >> "calculate field of view," "calculate optimal size," and "fit crop to >> image." >> >> Does this look right or is there an issue I'm missing? >> >> I've also attached a screenshot of the panorama I'm attempting to stitch >> for reference. >> >> On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 1:25 AM T. Modes <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> [email protected] schrieb am Samstag, 17. September 2022 um >>> 23:12:41 UTC+2: >>> >>>> Can anyone tell me why this is happening and what I'm doing wrong? >>>> >>>> The main issue that the final output size is very small: only 377x21 >>> pixel. >>> This is caused by a very strange choice of a rectilinear projection with >>> a fov of 179 deg. >>> Either decrease the field of view if you want to maintain the >>> rectilinear projection (and then recalculate crop). >>> But a better solution would be to change the output projection to >>> something other than rectilinear (e.g. cylindrical or equirectangular) and >>> then recalculate field of view and crop. >>> >>> -- >>> A list of frequently asked questions is available at: >>> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/165607a0-a06b-471f-8ac0-9ac84c81bed4n%40googlegroups.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/165607a0-a06b-471f-8ac0-9ac84c81bed4n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/b1be106a-b4eb-4d2c-a984-ea3280d1a133n%40googlegroups.com.
