The only thing that might be an open question here is why Celeste didn't work.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 4:04 PM Len Philpot <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, John and I corresponded via email and it turned out to basically > be a few wayward CPs (in the sky, etc.) that needed to be removed. I used a > leveled tripod and there were no nearby objects so parallax wasn't really a > factor. > I think I already corrected myself in this thread (not just by separate email). Image 2 was connected to image 0 incorrectly by a CP on clouds. They weren't the same cloud and it wasn't near the tiny area of overlap between images 0 and 2. Very similarly, image 2 was connected to image 4 by a CP across not actually matching clouds far outside the actual overlap between 2 and 4. Those two CPs were bad enough to completely warp image 2 in the panorama. Image 2 was also connected to image 1 by several CPs in clouds that did actually match AND there was no detectable change in the position of those clouds between the two shots (very fast photographer and/or unusually slow moving clouds). I guessed (but did not test) that leaving those CPs in was more likely to do harm than good. Again, the big question is why did Celeste leave them in. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CALe0Q_kDVZNEguCD8bGNb5p1r7%3DhpvjPPAjtUqDe2rb3k4G4vw%40mail.gmail.com.
