Hi Adrian, you should be ok with a slight camber, though this may be visible as a 'kink' in the final result.
Select Geometric -> Custom Parameters in the Photos tab, this will enable X, Y & Z parameters in the Optimise tab. There is a pop-up 'Control Point table' where you can find control-points with high error distances, the numbers are pixel distances in the final panorama output. -- Bruno On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 09:24, adrian pope wrote: > > Thank you for the reassurance. The underside is flat (except for the joints > which step in about an inch) but with a small precamber so that the middle is > about 60mm high over 10mm. > The photos are from two locations and I have tried both together (panorama > and mosaic) and separately but the prog does not overlay well. The beams have > a number of perpendicular shutter marks and I have called up a lot of these > as horizontal, but something else seems to be over-riding this. The auto > vertical finding gave short lengths and I added a number of full length ones > to help orientate the photos. I have attached a much reduced image for > interest :-) > I have not seen where to optimise x y and z, despite trying expert mode. > I will have a hunt through the automatic pairs of points to see if they have > caused a problem. I seem to recall an error of 7 (what ?) being shown during > stitching (7 pixel average error) but if someone would like a suggestion for > the prog then an option of highlighting those matched pairs with the highest > error would be useful -- Bruno -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/CAJV99ZhfuStRq-JuMrsrEyv%2BWMTNboNAXtoZiu4904n%2BetMbbQ%40mail.gmail.com.
