If the remapped images don't show the difference in colour, but the blend still does, could you output a reduced size remapped image set and upload it somewhere?
On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 22:00:38 UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > On Tue 06-Apr-2021 at 13:46 -0700, Jared wrote: > > > >I have one additional question, if you don't mind - the stiching came out > >well, but the blending is off. Here's a much smaller version of the > >stiched image for reference: > >https://boxdog.legroom.net/public/ffmap-example.jpg > > > >Note that the left column is darker than the rest. The source images > >aren't like that - they're uniformly blue. I suspect it's those dark > >splotches, I guess some kind of oil or water stains, that's throwing off > >the blending. Is there any reasonably straightforward way to tune that to > >get the original brighter blue across the full image? Both enblend and > >multiblend produced similar results. > > Hugin will try and optimise the brightness and colour of your images > to match if you ask it to, but your PTO project has default values > for photometric parameters. So it looks like your photos are > different somehow. > > In the Photos tab, optimise Photometric -> Low dynamic range, > variable white balance. > > -- > Bruno > -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/dae1bcd5-384f-41ce-aa37-11550a5a1760n%40googlegroups.com.
