Hello Bruno, On Thu, 2021-04-01 at 23:51 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote: > Has _anyone_ tested this? I'll assume that no reports of problems > indicates that everything is fine.
No, not tested here. For some reason I'd missed this, I'd normally at least test that I can build a Fedora rpm. I've just had a try at building the current default, but it doesn't work. I probably don't do this stuff often enough any more and have lost track of how to do things 🙂 The last time I built libpano13 was for my update to Fedora 33 and that produced the source package libpano13-2.9.20.tar.xz, this time I ended up with libpano13- 2.9.20-851-Linux.tar.gz and the rpmbuild spec file baulks at not finding libpano13-2.9.20: No such file or directory. I'm sure it's nothing to do with the source, just me not going about the right way. What I did was as follows: Update the repo. In my libpano repo, rm -rf BUILD, mkdir BUILD, cd BUILD, cmake .. make package which generated the libpano13-2.9.20-851-Linux.tar.gz package. I've obviously lost track of the process to build the source package for the rpmbuild. I'll see if I can sort that out and hopefully get a good build and test. Probably best not to wait too long for me, hopefully others will do some testing for you. Cheers, -- Terry Duell <[email protected]> -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/a98d312d577bf2ccb841a295355c2c86659307ef.camel%40iinet.net.au.
