I'm afraid you misunderstood a few parts. Yes, parallax doesn't affect correlation and yes a single CP has a low influence on the optimizer. As I understand the optimizer, it prefers what satisfies the larger number of CPs. If it has to chose between satisfying a few CPs in the trees or many CPs on the rock, it will prefer the rock and therefore the tree CPs will be more distant (if there is parallax). And yes you may want to focus on the rock. That doesn't change the issue. You could switch it and have mountains in the back and bushes 3 meters away. The point is if you could see both distance and correlation at the same time you may more easily determine whether there is parallax in those windy cases.
But if you say that the calculated correlation is not reliable in the first place, I guess there's no point in using it at all, in which case I can drop this request. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/zVjY8JK5PnXLN4t3JgXTOPEGsqKs-v6EpuoruSnIggk70x61i7VkBGzoK2YueL6me_vkk5XnLLpy8ZPvRDQb9QikGf2Kbw4f3qkS8FW9e00%3D%40protonmail.com.
