We are about to create a solution to continuously stitch images 7x24. The 
solution setup looks as follow:


Camera/lens: Nikon Z-series with Nikkor 14-30/4S, typically focal length 
around 20mm

Camera mounted vertical, rotated around nodal point. Horizonal 
repositioning 0.01 degree absolute.

Number of images typically between 8 to 10

Aperture, ISO and shutter speed gets automatically adjusted by own 
algorithm over the course of the day

Images are taken in manual mode. Image luminosity and color temperature is 
fixed for all images per panorama

Stitching with Hugin 2019.1 7x24 every 10 to 20 minutes based on a 
predefined project

Live example: https://feed.yellow.webcam/feed/44M64QO4X 
<https://feed.yellow.webcam/feed/44M64QO4X#>


We experience little issues except visible blending issues and are 
searching for advice. We usually adjust aperture first and keep shutter 
speed fast and ISO at fair level to avoid motion blur and get good image 
quality. Typical camera locations are on cable car poles and roof tops. 
Every test location shows little motion, either due to sunshine or wind 
speed sometimes exceeding 200 km/h. We understand the negative impact of 
larger aperture but cannot avoid it to get sharper images especially on 
windy days and at nighttime.

 

What can you recommend to lower blending issue? What parameter shall we 
tackle to get maximum benefit?


   - Correction of vignetting before stitching
   - Calculating lens distortion
   - Lens calibration
   - Optimize blending

Anyone experience with automated stitching 7x24?

Thanks
Daniel

-- 
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/1160ecb1-0173-4713-92a0-b8de6d9c7e46%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to