Hello, Paul.
That's an interesting example. I tried your test case and found, like
you, that it was not necessary to include the plane yaw and pitch
parameters in the optimisation to get a respectable result.
I also tried it on some of my own past examples. I found that,
generally, including the plane yaw and pitch parameters improved the
optimisation ( though not always by much ) but had no significant effect
on the stitch itself. So it's probably better to leave the plane pitch
and yaw parameters out of the optimisation.
Roger Broadie
-----Original Message-----
From: paul womack <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon 08 Oct 2018 09:22:54
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Mosaic mode test set
I have fairly carefully photographed a test set for mosaic mode
optimisation.
Every image was taken was a different point, and the tripod was set to
two different
heights. 2 Different focal lengths were used. The images are of a road
atlas
lying flat.
I attach the files, in screen resolution form (1088x816).
The Hugin project, also included, successfully lines up all 5 images.
I find it interesting (and beyond my understanding) that plane yaw and
plane pitch
are NOT required for this set of images.
BugBear
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/38f866e9-3466-834d-f686-2acd4dd3216e%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
