Am Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2018 18:03:10 UTC+2 schrieb Abrimaal: > > After optimization (y,v,p,r) the 2nd image was still much smaller. So I > copied the field of view from the 1st image to the 2nd. > However they still varied in size, so there were many attempts to put a > correct value there. > For this use case the preset y,p,r,v is not the best choice. This preset optimize hfov of both images. You need to optimize hfov of the second image only in this case. So use user defined optimization and optimize v,y,p,r of second image only.
Another example - one image is original from a camera, the other one is > cropped from the original, both with EXIF data. > The field of view is of both images is set to the same value, but the > cropped image is much larger. > This is expected because there is no information about the cropping in the Exif data. So Hugin does a wrong guessing. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/d2dd1119-07f6-441d-8e63-48c5898e090c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
