Hmm, then maybe just output mapped images, since you don't want Hugin to
blend them anyway? Then you can blend them manually.
I don't understand the seam finding algorithms, either. For all I know,
NONE of them use a repeatable seam.
On 12/16/2017 11:21 AM, J Harvey wrote:
Not a focus stack. A 2 row panorama, same focal length, same exposure,
roughly the same focus at infinity (landscape image).
The panorama output is fine. It's just not repeatable, even with the
exact same input files, and no changes to the .pto file. I literally
select 'stitch' twice (exposure fused from any arrangement, optimal
size, no resizing set in preferences, all other values to default),
three times, four times in a row without changing any of the variables,
and each output panorama image is different. See the gif I posted above.
I don't understand how the algorithm works, that the same exact
variables produce different results, unless there is some random seed
somewhere.
What I'd like to do, is to produce panoramas with consistently matched
pixels, so that I can manually blend differently stretched jpgs derived
from the same RAW files.
On Saturday, December 16, 2017 at 10:11:52 PM UTC+1, GnomeNomad wrote:
Sounds like you're doing focus stacks.
This search returned a number of articles and such about doing that
with Hugin:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=focus+stack+hugin&t=ftas&ia=web
<https://duckduckgo.com/?q=focus+stack+hugin&t=ftas&ia=web>
On December 15, 2017 11:40:20 PM HST, J Harvey
<[email protected]> wrote:
I'm not trying to produce a traditional HDR image. I have a
panorama image with clearly defined foreground, mid ground, and
distance elements, and I'd like each region to have it's own set
of non-linear level adjustments, and consequently the sharpening
and saturation can vary between them. There is a higher level
of variance that can be produced by producing three sets of jpgs
from the RAW images, and making 3 panoramas from each set of
images, rather than producing a middle level jpg series, making
a panorama out of that, and then stretching the panorama
independently for the foreground, mid ground, and distance.
I have one .pto file for the panorama, and three sets of images
that are named the same, in different folders. But when I apply
the same .pto panorama parameters file, with no changes, the
output has somewhat significant spatial differences. I could
understand if the control points varied between each set of
images, since image elements present slightly differently with
different levels and sharpening, but I'm using the same set of
control points.
In fact, just running the same .pto file subsequently with
different images gives me different results. It's like there's
a stochastic element to the panorama creation, it doesn't
produce the same results, consistently, given the same inputs- I
can't reproduce the same panoramas.
Linux, Hugin
Version: 2015.0.0.cdefc6e53a58
On Saturday, December 16, 2017 at 5:05:40 AM UTC+1, Tduell wrote:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 13:59:10 +1100, J Harvey
<[email protected]>
wrote:
> I am trying to manually create a HDR or mixed exposure
image. I want to
> stitch 8 image together with three different exposure and
sharpening
> settings.
>
[snip]
I may not have understood why you are using the approach you
describe, and
wonder why you are not loading all the images and using
stacks to get your
HDR.
Cheers,
--
Regards,
Terry Duell
--
David W. Jones
[email protected]
wandering the landscape of god
http://dancingtreefrog.com
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/4c794ad3-b390-1488-1bb5-bc7bc89b6cef%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
