At least I have :-) I already started with a proof of concept which showed that it's feasible and even comes with a performance improvement.
Though, this is a lot of work and new tests need to be written to make sure that there is no backwards incompatibility. As soon as Carl switches to git I'll fork the repo and start on a Moose port in my spare time. cheers, mo On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 04:29:11 +0200, Oleg Kostyuk <cub.ua...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > Do you have plans about Moosification? At least, this could be > interesting for Catalyst-related parts. I mean, modify code to provide > itself as Moose::Role, and make sure that it will work well with other > components. First of all, I'm talking about using after/before > modifiers, instead of method re-defining. > > And other question, but not directly related to Moosification. Do you > have experience to combine in one controller > Catalyst::Controller::HTML::FormFu and Catalyst::Action::REST? I'm > asking, because both FormFu and REST use special handler method names > - like ***_GET (from REST) or ***_FORM_VALID (from FormFu). Is both of > them will work well? Of course, it's possible to look into sources, > but may be someone already know answer?... > > Thanks. > > -- > Sincerely yours, > Oleg Kostyuk (CUB-UANIC) > > _______________________________________________ > HTML-FormFu mailing list > HTML-FormFu@lists.scsys.co.uk > http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu _______________________________________________ HTML-FormFu mailing list HTML-FormFu@lists.scsys.co.uk http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
