Am Sonntag 26 April 2009 10:09:27 schrieb Carl Franks: > 2009/4/25 Mario Minati <mario.min...@googlemail.com>: > >> Hi Carl, > >> > >> is a Repeatable without a nested name possible, maybe for radios or > >> checkboxes? > > > > Actually I found this problem in 't/elements/block_repeatable_inc.yml'. > > The old implementation produced: > > > > <form action="" method="post"> > > <fieldset> > > <div> > > <div class="text"> > > <input name="foo_1" type="text" /> > > </div> > > <div class="text"> > > <input name="bar_1" type="text" /> > > </div> > > </div> > > <div> > > <div class="text"> > > <input name="foo_2" type="text" /> > > </div> > > <div class="text"> > > <input name="bar_2" type="text" /> > > </div> > > </div> > > <div class="submit"> > > <input name="submit" type="submit" /> > > </div> > > </fieldset> > > </form> > > > > The one returns: > > <form action="" method="post"> > > <fieldset> > > <div> > > <div class="text"> > > <input name="_1.foo" type="text" /> > > </div> > > <div class="text"> > > <input name="_1.bar" type="text" /> > > </div> > > </div> > > <div> > > <div class="text"> > > <input name="_2.foo" type="text" /> > > </div> > > <div class="text"> > > <input name="_2.bar" type="text" /> > > </div> > > </div> > > <div class="submit"> > > <input name="submit" type="submit" /> > > </div> > > </fieldset> > > </form> > > > > To resolve this problem I can think of some solutions: > > a) Croak without a nested_name for Repeatable > > b) Use old implementation (nested.foo_1) if no nested_name is given > > c) Autocreate a nested_name if non is given > > I think probably b) > - so that it doesn't change behaviour unnecessarily
I will than use a function to switch the algorithm to use. Greets, Mario _______________________________________________ HTML-FormFu mailing list HTML-FormFu@lists.scsys.co.uk http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
