The new code changes will only save the first row in a has_many to
has_many relationship. Anything beyond the first row is not saved.
Similair to the problem of not having the counter set correctly in a
repeatable.
Have you allowed for the counter NAME to be incremented since it is now
in a repeatable element?
Ascii King wrote:
Woot! Preliminary tests show that the code is working now. Bless you!
My entire job just got a lot easier. I have tested the code against my
app and it seems to read the data in, but won't save it. I will test
a bit more.
I have written a write test, and I will work on a read test.
Ascii King wrote:
I've written a test to cover the has_many to has_many but i'm still
working out how to submit it. I will check the new code right away,
though.
Carl Franks wrote:
2009/4/8 Ascii King <[email protected]>:
I am using FormFu with Catalyst to load a very complex form. I am
testing a
repeatable within a repeatable call to the database and it is
failing to
display the data from the database.
Organization -> has_many -> Person -> has_many -> Equipment
An Organization (table) has many Person (table) records.
A Person (table) has many Equipment (table) records.
* I can display the Organization record.
* I place the related Person records within a repeatable element and
they display fine.
* I place the related Equipment records within a repeatable element
and they display fine.
* I place the related Equipment records within a repeatable element
inside of the Person repeatable and they will NOT display any
data.
It does however display the right number of Equipment records, but the
fields are all empty.
It seems to me that the "sub _fill_nested" routine is the part
that won't
populate the fields. HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC seems to have pulled
the data
from the database accurately, but it will not put the data into the
fields.
Perhaps it is because it doesn't know how to interpret the new
fieldname
with the extra underscore and number?
example:
<input name="persons.equipments.equipment_id_1_3" type="hidden"
id="persons.equipments.equipment_id_1_3" />
I've made some fixes to support Repeatable-within-a-Repeatable,
could you checkout HTML-FormFu ( -r 1450 or higher )
and HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC ( -r 1451 or higher )
from svn, and give it a try again?
The only scenario that's currently covered in the test suite is
many-to-many -> has-many,
simply because the test schema already had those relationships setup.
If you have any problems with, for example, has_many -> has_many,
then we'll need to expand the test suite to cover it.
Carl
_______________________________________________
HTML-FormFu mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
_______________________________________________
HTML-FormFu mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
_______________________________________________
HTML-FormFu mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
_______________________________________________
HTML-FormFu mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
