Carl Franks wrote:
Sigh, I just didn't want to mess people about by renaming all the Element files to CamelCase - when I did the exact opposite 5 months ago. That's really the only reason I suggested such a complicated solution. And I feel the current inconsistency has the potential to cause confusion further down the line.
I think we're in a good spot right now because of the fact that FormFu has yet to have a non-dev release -- we can waffle a bit with the API and syntax.
You claim that the "type" param is far removed from perl class names -- i don't really agree since it basically represents which class to initialize for that element (especially for custom elements: "+My::Element").
However, in the end, i don't particularly care which way it goes as long as it's consistent and documented :)
I would support you should it go either way. -Brian _______________________________________________ HTML-FormFu mailing list HTML-FormFu@lists.scsys.co.uk http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/html-formfu
