Try using:
EQ_MP thm2 thm1;;
Or (some variant of) rewriting:
REWRITE_RULE[thm2] thm1;;
Regards,
Petros
On 18 July 2018 23:42:48 EEST, Dylan Melville <dylanmelvi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I have a set of theorems, which state:
>
>let thm1 = A;;
>let thm2 = A <=> B;;
>
>And I want a theorem that states B. I tried making B my goal, and using
>MESON_TAC[thm1,thm2] but MESON timed out. What’s the proper way to
>prove B?
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>_______________________________________________
>hol-info mailing list
>hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info
--
Sent from a phone.
Dr. Petros Papapanagiotou
Senior Researcher
CISA, School of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/ppapapan/
---
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
hol-info mailing list
hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info
