An hypothesis of the form “∀x. P” where “x” occurs free in P is stronger
than just “P” (that is, the former entails the later). Many tactics have
built-in specialization, so it depends on what you want to do. Can you
provide more details?

On 03/07/18 14:18, Dylan Melville wrote:
> Is there any tactical that can take universal quantification off of a 
> hypothesis like how GEN_TAC does with the goal?
> 
> -Dylan
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> hol-info mailing list
> hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
hol-info mailing list
hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info

Reply via email to