I agree with Konrad. We should keep the hol-info mailing list to discussions 
about higher order logic and theorem proving.

Thomas


On 30.01.2018 17:13, Konrad Slind wrote:
> Maybe we can stick to higher order logic? This discussion does not
> belong on hol-info.
>
> Thanks,
> Konrad.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Mario Xerxes Castelán Castro
> <marioxcc...@yandex.com> wrote:
>> Hello Bram. Welcome to the mailing list.
>>
>> On 30/01/18 05:22, Bram Geron wrote:
>>> I have only just subscribed to this list before you sent this message, but 
>>> I believe that the use of "he" as a neutral pronoun makes women 
>>> subconsciously feel like they are not really welcome in the community.
>> The claim that “women subconsciously feel like they are not really
>> welcome in the community” is not _even_ wrong as some physicists would
>> put it. The problem is that it is not falsifiable, because the
>> “subconscious” is a vague concept on which anything can be claimed and
>> nothing can be proved because the very concept of subconscious implies
>> that it has no observable effect.
>>
>> Anyway, if we delete “subconscious” from your message we are left with a
>> less vague claim. My reply would be this: If anybody feels excluded by
>> the use of generic (w.r.t. grammatical gender) grammar is because he
>> wants to feel excluded. By definition, generic nouns are inclusive of
>> both sexes.
>>
>>> Participation of women in computer science is problematically low across 
>>> the globe, and I do think that small things like using "he" to refer to a 
>>> group including women hurts this cause. I think you'll find you get used to 
>>> they/them/their surprisingly quickly, and in a great number of 
>>> (scientific/industry) communities it is now accepted as the gender-neutral 
>>> pronoun.
>> No, it is not “problematically” low. What “problems” does it bring for
>> “computer science”? none; it may be against the ultraliberals' politcal
>> agenda, but that is not computer science problem. Anyway, it is not just
>> computer science but intellectual activities in general.
>>
>> Anybody can send a patch, publish computer software or a book about
>> mathematics. Sex makes no difference. If one sex does so less often than
>> the other, it is because of lack of capability and interest.
>>
>> This way of thinking seems to be a result of the push for “diversity”
>> and “social justice”. Through history, men as group have shown higher
>> intellectual success than women. The feminists cried that this was
>> because of systematic oppression (this itself is an intellectual
>> achievements, since men succeeded while women failed to achieve such
>> oppression for their benefit). Well, society gave women a chance. Now
>> (in nearly all of the world) women have either the same or more (there
>> are social programs exclusively for women, but hardly any exclusively
>> for men) opportunities w.r.t. knowledge than men, yet they still show
>> the same poor performance as a group (I can cite examples if requested).
>> They were given an opportunity and failed. Thus the claim that both
>> sexes are “equal” with respect to intellectual capability has lost its
>> credibility.
>>
>> This is to much disgust of the ultraliberals, because it undermines
>> their agenda that includes making everybody believe that we are all
>> “equal” (reality notwithstanding!). It is them who must accept reality,
>> not the rest of us who must become oblivious to it.
>>
>> I refuse to become oblivious to reality and jump into the “we are all
>> equal“ bandwagon. I urge you to refuse too.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> hol-info mailing list
>> hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> hol-info mailing list
> hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
hol-info mailing list
hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info

Reply via email to