I just noticed that Voevodsky's Homotopy Type Theory book deals on p 7 with 
issues I've posted here:
http://hottheory.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/hott-online.pdf

   One difficulty often encountered by the classical mathematician when
   faced with learning about type theory is that [it is not even]
   familiar to most working mathematicians, even those who might be
   interested in foundations of mathematics.

   One objective of the present work is to develop an informal style of
   doing mathematics in univalent foundations that is at once rigorous
   and precise, but is also closer to the language and style of
   presentation of everyday mathematics.

   In present-day mathematics, [...] for the most part, one does not even
   need to be aware of this possibility [of ZFC formalization], since it
   largely coincides with the condition that a proof be "fully rigorous"
   (in the sense that all mathematicians have come to understand
   intuitively through education and experience).

   One can imagine a not-too-distant future when it will be possible for
   mathematicians to verify the correctness of their own papers by
   working within the system of univalent foundations, formalized in a
   proof assistant, and that doing so will become as natural as
   typesetting their own papers in TEX. In principle, this could be
   equally true for any other foundational system, but we believe it to
   be more practically attainable using univalent foundations, as
   witnessed by the present work and its formal counterpart.

This sounds great!  And the comment on `"fully rigorous" education and 
experience' is very interesting.  My feeling right now is that if Voevodsky's 
univalent ideas are helpful, we port them to HOL, where I would think it would 
work better.  Isn't straight HOL much easier to write formal proofs in that 
straight Coq, where you have to master the intricacies of dependent types?  

-- 
Best,
Bill 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
hol-info mailing list
hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info

Reply via email to