Le 02.04.13 21:46, Bill Richter a écrit :
> Thanks, Vincent, but I really was wrong, I just made an error in describing 
> my mistake.  You're right (and I knew it):
>
>     if you just type `&1 + 1`, you still get the exception:
>
> My error was thinking that the presence of preterm_of_term would keep `&1 + 
> 1` from being evaluated, and that was wrong.  I learned about parse_term from 
> Freek, as a way to emulate backquotes into miz3, which doesn't allow them.  
> But outside of miz3, doesn't parse_term mean the same as backquotes?
>
Yes.

(note: I know almost nothing about miz3)

-- 
Vincent ARAVANTINOS - PostDoctoral Fellow - Concordia University, Hardware
Verification Group
http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~vincent/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire 
the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the 
Employer Resources Portal
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
_______________________________________________
hol-info mailing list
hol-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hol-info

Reply via email to