> Well first, I never said it would be deleted after the Alpha. I said it > would be deleted *at some point*, meaning at some point after 6 is moved to > master.
Sorry, my bad On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 1:34 PM Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 7:22 AM Davide D'Alto <dav...@hibernate.org> wrote: >> >> +1 for the creation of the branch upstream and everything Yoann said. >> >> One curiosity, once there is an alpha, why would you delete the whole >> branch? >> Couldn't you change everything on the existing branch without deleting it? >> It's unusual to rewrite the history of upstream branches but we have >> done it before. > > > Well first, I never said it would be deleted after the Alpha. I said it > would be deleted *at some point*, meaning at some point after 6 is moved to > master. > > Also, IMO, topic branches upstream are generally speaking a very bad idea. > So this is something we hardly ever do - maybe y'all do on other projects, > dunno. But either way, it is very common for a topic branch to go away > eventually. > > As far as re-writing history, sure it is unusual but we are already in the > realm of unusual merely by having a topic branch upstream > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
