By the way, did you have an error using the old names? Because they should still be supported.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:16 AM Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Laurent, > > Good catch. The classes have been moved to an internal package and we > should now use the short names instead. > > Created https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-12829, will fix right > away. > > -- > Guillaume > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:43 PM Laurent Almeras <lalme...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Sorry to bother you on a deprecated feature subject, but I think the >> package names provided in documentation are broken : >> >> https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/stable/orm/userguide/html_single/Hibernate_User_Guide.html#caching-provider-ehcache-region-factory >> >> Do we agree that the correct names are >> org.hibernate.cache.ehcache.internal.SingletonEhCacheRegionFactory and >> org.hibernate.cache.ehcache.internal.EhCacheRegionFactory ? Not sure I'm >> right because of the .internal package; I spontaneously understand it as >> « private, do not touch » package. >> >> If I'm not wrong, I can open a Jira and propose a PR. >> >> >> -- >> Laurent Almeras >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev