I don’t think spending the n hours on outweighs the explained benefits so I would keep it that way. The reason I had the dates were because blogs are time sensitive (like any content really), and it avoids or reduces the risk of slug collision for which we would need to implement a workaround for.
> On 22 Mar 2018, at 15:18, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> > wrote: > >> Note I'm not suggesting to change any existing URLs. Rather my question is, >> should we go to the date-less schema for new posts going forward. >> > > Personally I like having the date information in the URL but I won't fight > for it. > > The only thing is I want to keep the on disk format as it is i.e. with the > dates at the start of the file names. It's really easier to find the posts > this way. > > Apart from that, I don't really care. > > By the way, this is me not volunteering to do the work :). > > -- > Guillaume > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
