The next time-box is in fact 2 weeks... :) Hopefully we have these JPA TCK challenges resolved by then and can do CR then. So yes, please have feedback by then. Yoann and I have been working on Search and ORM 5.3 (at least parts) so I think that will work out fine. But yes, OGM makes me a little nervous as as far as I know we have no idea about that integration yet
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:22 AM Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would say let's go for Beta2. We are not in a hurry considering the > challenges still pending so no need to rush in the CR phase. > > On the NoORM side: > - Search - Yoann has prepared a PR with the 5.3 support so we should be OK > on this side. 5.9 will be tagged early next week and we'll release an alpha > of 5.10 for OGM consumption. > - OGM - Davide is going to release OGM 5.2 (still with ORM 5.1) early next > week, then we will merge the ORM 5.2 support that is pending for quite some > time (the PR is ready, just waiting for the 5.2 release) and we will > experiment with the 5.3 support on top of that. I don't expect many issues > as it's not a step as big as 5.1 -> 5.2. > > So you can expect some feedback from us in the next 2 weeks. > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Chris Cranford <ch...@hibernate.org> > wrote: > >> I have no strong preference either way. >> >> On 01/30/2018 05:00 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote: >> > Wanted to remind everyone that tomorrow is the next time-boxed release >> for >> > 5.3. >> > >> > I wanted to get everyone's opinions about the version number, whether >> this >> > should be Beta2 or CR1. IMO It depends how you view the remaining >> > challenges with the JPA TCK, with CR1 being the optimistic view. >> > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
