I had been wondering about that, too, but I felt for now it's better located on the impl site (Hibernate org).
It'd definitely be nice for this to be a BV effort, but for that I'd also like to get some feedback and input from others on the EG. My thinking was to keep that discussion for the 2.1 lifecycle, but if you like feel free to reach out to the list and ask for feedback, we also can do it now if there's some interest. --Gunnar 2018-01-10 11:43 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > So I did the move. > > And then I thought why not the beanvalidation organization? > > I didn't think of it before as I'm not sure this benchmark will stay > totally HV agnostic but for now it is and it could probably stay this way. > If we want some HV specific things, we can still add a specific benchmark > module and keep the BV ones separated. > > It would be nice if it was considered a Bean Validation effort rather than > as a purely HV one. > > But maybe it makes it too official to have it in the BV organization? > > WDYT? > > -- > Guillaume > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> > wrote: > >> +1, good idea. Thanks! >> >> 2018-01-09 14:46 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Now that we added some more value to the Bean Validation benchmark [1] >>> (Marko converted them to JMH), I think it's time to move the repo to the >>> Hibernate org. >>> >>> Anyone against it? >>> >>> FYI, it's Apache 2 licensed as it's derived from previous work from the >>> Apache BVal people. >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/gsmet/beanvalidation-benchmark >>> >>> -- >>> Guillaume >>> _______________________________________________ >>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
