Kudos to you! I'm slowly beginning to understand what a pain such work can be... Nice to have a reminder that this work can ultimately be rewarded ;)
Yoann Rodière Hibernate NoORM Team yo...@hibernate.org On 19 July 2017 at 16:44, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > So, as we are leaning towards final, I made another round of benchmarking > on HV 6. > > They are run on the same machine as the previous "Hibernate Validator 6 > benchmarks results" I posted a few months ago [1] so they can be compared > to these numbers (you'll notice the 5.4.1 numbers are about the same > between the 2 emails). > > Note that these benchmarks only exercises the validation engine but does > not report any violation. > > I think I'll add some more benchmarks to ensure violation reporting also > moves in the right direction. > > It might also be a good occasion to revisit this benchmark: > http://carinae.net/2010/06/benchmarking-hibernate-validator-and-apache- > beanvalidation-the-two-jsr-303-implementations/ > . With a large value of "revisit" as it's really basic but the scenarios > are interesting. Note that I'm a bit pessimistic on the parsing part: we > now do a lot more work than before to deal with container elements so the > startup cost will probably be significantly higher. > > == Apache BVal 1.1.2 > > Result > "org.hibernate.validator.performance.simple.SimpleValidation. > testSimpleBeanValidation": > 357.500 ±(99.9%) 5.327 ops/ms [Average] > (min, avg, max) = (337.100, 357.500, 381.472), stdev = 10.760 > CI (99.9%): [352.173, 362.827] (assumes normal distribution) > > Result > "org.hibernate.validator.performance.cascaded.CascadedValidation. > testCascadedValidation": > 379.605 ±(99.9%) 5.817 ops/ms [Average] > (min, avg, max) = (360.654, 379.605, 411.361), stdev = 11.750 > CI (99.9%): [373.789, 385.422] (assumes normal distribution) > > (not really clear how BVal happens to be faster in the cascaded validation > case) > > == HV 5.4.1.Final > > Result > "org.hibernate.validator.performance.simple.SimpleValidation. > testSimpleBeanValidation": > 558.196 ±(99.9%) 3.643 ops/ms [Average] > (min, avg, max) = (542.396, 558.196, 575.360), stdev = 7.360 > CI (99.9%): [554.552, 561.839] (assumes normal distribution) > > Result > "org.hibernate.validator.performance.cascaded.CascadedValidation. > testCascadedValidation": > 285.788 ±(99.9%) 1.970 ops/ms [Average] > (min, avg, max) = (278.611, 285.788, 298.530), stdev = 3.980 > CI (99.9%): [283.817, 287.758] (assumes normal distribution) > > == Master from March after the first round of improvements (numbers taken > from the previous email) > > Result > "org.hibernate.validator.performance.simple.SimpleValidation. > testSimpleBeanValidation": > 869.546 ±(99.9%) 14.734 ops/ms [Average] > (min, avg, max) = (760.007, 869.546, 909.206), stdev = 29.763 > CI (99.9%): [854.813, 884.280] (assumes normal distribution) > > Result > "org.hibernate.validator.performance.cascaded.CascadedValidation. > testCascadedValidation": > 343.699 ±(99.9%) 2.077 ops/ms [Average] > (min, avg, max) = (331.333, 343.699, 352.626), stdev = 4.196 > CI (99.9%): [341.622, 345.776] (assumes normal distribution) > > == HV 6 - Current master with > https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-validator/pull/814 applied > > Result > "org.hibernate.validator.performance.simple.SimpleValidation. > testSimpleBeanValidation": > 924.121 ±(99.9%) 3.686 ops/ms [Average] > (min, avg, max) = (905.423, 924.121, 941.295), stdev = 7.446 > CI (99.9%): [920.435, 927.807] (assumes normal distribution) > > Result > "org.hibernate.validator.performance.cascaded.CascadedValidation. > testCascadedValidation": > 430.092 ±(99.9%) 3.661 ops/ms [Average] > (min, avg, max) = (416.439, 430.092, 447.607), stdev = 7.396 > CI (99.9%): [426.431, 433.754] (assumes normal distribution) > > == Conclusion > > The good news is that the results are even better than the ones from March, > after some further tweaking. > > We are significantly faster than BVal in these scenarios and also > significantly faster than 5.4.1.Final. > > Now, we need to get this PR in :). > > [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hibernate-dev/2017-March/016057.html > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
