+1 for 'local-heap'. But I still like 'Buster' :)
On 05/19/2017 10:34 AM, Gustavo Fernandes wrote: > -1 to demote it to "testing" > > Let me show the other side of the coin :) > > RAMDirectory has its uses, as long as one understands its limitations. It > is convenient for small non-persistent indexes, and last time I measured, > it was faster to load than the FS directory. > > So it could be used in production (and I believe some people do), and > renaming it to "testing" would feel a bit awkward. One example of > production use of the RAMDirectory is the ES Percolator [1] > > We can always throw config errors or log WARN if someone is using "ram" > with clustered caches on Infinispan, but if rebranding is really needed, > I'd vote for something like "local-ram" or "local-heap". > > Thanks, > Gustavo > > [1] > https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/blob/master/modules/percolator/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/percolator/PercolateQueryBuilder.java > > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> > wrote: > >> -1 for "ephemeral" and "volatile", they are pretty much synonyms of >> "ram" with all the same possible confusions, even to the point of >> looking like being the recommended choice for "ephemeral class" >> machines on openstack. >> >> "unreliable": it's not unrelaiable as it's actually very reliable and >> to be recommended for testing, e.g. if you have an issue with our >> other directories I'd love to know if you can reproduce it with this >> one. >> >> I'll go with "testing". I want to be able to recommend it for testing, >> and make it clear it's only meant for that. >> >> >> On 18 May 2017 at 20:22, Gunnar Morling <gunnar.morl...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >>> I'd argue you can keep the name, if it's in the test JAR. If people >>> still use it in their production code, well... >>> >>> Otherwise, how about "ephemeral"? >>> >>> 2017-05-18 19:05 GMT+02:00 Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org>: >>>> On 18 May 2017 at 17:31, Gunnar Morling <gunnar.morl...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >>>>> Can't you just move it to the test JAR if it's for testing only? >>>> Interesting idea, we can try that as well. >>>> >>>> I'd still want to set the name straight though. Let's agree on a name >> first. >>>>> Am 18.05.2017 6:29 nachm. schrieb "Sanne Grinovero" < >> sa...@hibernate.org>: >>>>> Right technically it's not a unit test. But I'd like to focus on the >>>>> testing aspect, as "local-ram" might still convey concepts as "fast", >>>>> maybe even expect it to engage Infinispan's off-heap capabilities, or >>>>> just being an option to consider for other reasons. >>>>> >>>>> "testing" ? >>>>> >>>>> On 18 May 2017 at 17:20, Adrian Nistor <anis...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>> I agree, but probably "unit-testing" is not such a good name either. >>>>>> Technically, that's a functional test. >>>>>> I think I like "local-ram" better, implying that it is not >>>>>> shared/distributed and it is also volatile. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 05/18/2017 06:07 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >>>>>>> As anyone who's bothered to read the manual knows, the "ram" >> directory >>>>>>> should really only be used for unit tests. The other implementations, >>>>>>> while typically disk based, are also faster (memory mapped files) and >>>>>>> more efficient (better locking design) so there's really no reason to >>>>>>> use it, not even performance except for trivial, small, non important >>>>>>> data sets. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For example the Elasticsearch team is making sure of this by having >>>>>>> totally removed the option of using the RAMDirectory - something I >>>>>>> actually don't appreciate as our unit tests could benefit from it, >>>>>>> having slow storage on our test environments. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tristan is reporting that the "ram" terminology is confusing people, >>>>>>> not least in the Infinispan community as "RAM" might be ambiguous >>>>>>> since everything is in memory, and people get surprised it's not >>>>>>> replicated in the "in memory cluster". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wouldn't want to go to the extremes of the Elasticsearch team as I >>>>>>> believe having this option is very useful, especially for testing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Should we rename (rebrand) its short name "ram" into "unit-testing" ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I suspect that would make people think a bit more before pushing it >>>>>>> into production... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Sanne >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>>>> >>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev