Then let it be so! Thanks guys
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:01 PM andrea boriero <and...@hibernate.org> wrote: > No objection > > On 28 Apr 2017 17:51, "Steve Ebersole" <st...@hibernate.org> wrote: > >> Currently Hibernate implements the JPA metamodel contracts with a series >> of >> wrapper objects defined in the `org.hibernate.metamodel` package. This is >> non-ideal because it is a wrapper approach rather than integrating the JPA >> contracts into our runtime model which we are doing in these 6.0 changes >> (Navigable ties in these JPA contracts). >> >> Based on that I propose that we simply "drop" the >> `org.hibernate.metamodel` >> package. The only question is what "drop" means here. Does it mean just >> remove these from 6.0 (possibly retro-deprecating on 5.2)? Or does it >> mean >> we follow the deprecate-and-shadow approach? >> >> To me this really comes down to whether we expect or ever expected users >> to >> access stuff from this `org.hibernate.metamodel` package. Considering >> that >> these are defined specifically in `org.hibernate.metamodel.internal` (an >> internal package) I would argue not, and that we should just remove them >> from 6.0 and replace in usage with Navigable and friends. >> >> Any objections? >> > _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
