Hi, On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org> wrote:
> On the license, I think ASL 2.0 is the best for such project. > As we discussed it in Lisbon, we might "copy" (using Maven) sources from an internal utility project to the NoORM projects, as we want to avoid dependency hell with different versions of the utilities. In this case, they might be included in the source jar. Thus, I think the best is to dual license everything from the start. I'll go do that. > On the group id, am I right that this project is some utilities used by us > internally? And would not be imported by a user? > > If true then I’d avoid common as it feels like something that a user would > import. internal could work. Some other proposal (to be combined or not): > - utilities > - infra > - toolbox > OK, if internal works for you, let's settle on it. It's widely used in the Java world to name internal packages. It makes perfect sense here. > On the theme, I don't have a definitive opinion but I think like Guillaume > I’d prefer a lighter customized version of the default Asciidoc theme > rather than the heavyweight one. > OK, let's start with this to unblock the situation with OGM and Search. ORM can still use part of the theme (the PDF goodies) and keep their CSS if they prefer. And once they moved to use part of it, we can revisit and adjust so that everyone is happy. It's not as if the changes were breaking changes for the users, it won't be an issue to adjust one way or the other. -- Guillaume _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
