+1 to fail fast with the explicit error in that case. > On 1 Feb 2017, at 11:33, Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > JPA defines for validation mode "auto" that bean validation must occur > if a BV provider is present and that no validation shall occur > otherwise. > > What should happen though if a BV provider such as HV is present but > it fails to bootstrap? In case of HV this happens if no expression > language implementation can be found. > > Currently, the user has a very hard time to find out about this, as > this exception essentially is suppressed (for mode "callback" the > exception is raised). > > Should we raise a specific exception in HV if it cannot be > bootstrapped? In ORM, we could handle that one specifically and raise > it also if for validation mode "auto" (would have to happen > reflectively, though, as to avoid a hard dependency). > > I can do this change but first wanted to make sure that this is inline > with what you all think should be done. > > Thanks, > > --Gunnar > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
