Can you write a blog post with a small poll to know if anyone complains about dropping REST. Let's have it on for a week and make a decision. If nothing conclusive comes out, let's drop it.
On Fri 2016-08-26 8:27, Davide D'Alto wrote: > > Thinking out loud. How much additional work would it be to keep the "old" > > rest in a legacy module > > It would still require to be maintained, I would prefer not to have it > unless there is a specific use case for it > > >. Does Bolt run atop HTTP as I remember it > > I don't think so, it's a binary protocol that connects to a port using > sockets. > > > PS: it's a bit sad that we implement something (rest remote) and it's ready > > and by lack of release it is replaced and remove it without seeing the > > light of day. Release often. > > That's actually a bad call from my side, I wanted to release with the > new ORM and it took longer than expected to merge the PR. > > Davide > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Emmanuel Bernard > <emman...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > Thinking out loud. How much additional work would it be to keep the "old" > > rest in a legacy module separated from the pure one? > > Does it even make sense? > > > > I'm fine with the removal and focus on bolt on a general basis. Does Bolt > > run atop HTTP as I remember it ? Or is that specific ? If the later some > > might want to keep using rest. > > > > Emmanuel > > > > PS: it's a bit sad that we implement something (rest remote) and it's ready > > and by lack of release it is replaced and remove it without seeing the > > light of day. Release often. > > > >> On 22 août 2016, at 22:25, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Davide, > >> > >> I wanted to add 2 things: > >> - Neo4j remote with Rest has not been released yet; > >> - if we remove the Rest protocol, remote Neo4j will only be supported with > >> Neo4j >= 3 > >> > >> Personally I'm +1 to only support remote Neo4j with Bolt. Maintaining one > >> more dialect/protocol just to provide remote for Neo4j < 3 does not sound > >> like a good tradeoff to me. > >> > >> -- > >> Guillaume > >> > >>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Davide D'Alto <dav...@hibernate.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> at the moment in OGM we connect remotely using the Rest API. > >>> The reason is that when I created the dialect the new Bolt[1] protocol > >>> wasn't available. > >>> > >>> I've now finished implementing the dialect so that it uses the Bolt > >>> protocol, there is a lot of duplication since it is very similar to > >>> the approach I used for Rest. > >>> > >>> I worked for a while trying to improve the code but I started to > >>> wonder if it might be really helpful to provide two ways to connect > >>> remotely with an increase in complexity of the code (more interfaces > >>> mainly with some additional classes). > >>> > >>> I'm now of the idea that we could remove the dialect thata uses Rest > >>> and only keep the one that uses Bolt (as suggested by Giulliame in an > >>> old chat on hipchat). > >>> > >>> This will simplify the code and we can always add it back if the need > >>> arise or somebody asks. > >>> Note that the Bolt protocol is the suggested one to use for Neo4j > >>> since it promises better performance. > >>> It will also allow us to remove some dependencies required for the rest > >>> client. > >>> > >>> Please, let me know if you think there is value in keeping both > >>> approaches, otherwise I'm going to send a PR that removes the remote > >>> one. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Davide > >>> > >>> [1] https://dzone.com/articles/introducing-bolt-neo4js- > >>> upcoming-binary-protocol-p > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> hibernate-dev mailing list > >>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > >> _______________________________________________ > >> hibernate-dev mailing list > >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > hibernate-dev mailing list > > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
