Because we likely have more breaking changed planned in 6.0, I don't think your renaming plan would add a lot. Better focus on 6.
> On 18 août 2016, at 14:42, Scott Marlow <smar...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> On 08/17/2016 03:54 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote: >> For whatever reason discussion about JavaMoney/Moneta support has heated up >> again the past few days. Is this important enough to warrant a 5.3 release? > > My (late) vote is to rename 5.2 -> 6.0 and have the 5.3 release be based > on the current ORM 5.1 branch. 5.3 would include changes that are > compatible with ORM 5.0.x applications (so that 5.0 users can migrate to > 5.3, without having to rewrite code). 5.2 users would then migrate to > 6.0, which would continue to have the same changes (plus whatever else > is included). I'm thinking that this would open up a path for new ORM > features to be made available to ORM 5.0.x applications, via the 5.3+ > releases. > >> >> If we are going to cut a 5.3 I'd also suggest we include the recent work I >> did in regards to CDI support as well[1]. >> >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/sebersole/hibernate-core/tree/wip/6.0/hibernate-core/src/main/java/org/hibernate/resource/cdi >> _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
