Good plan. > On 24 août 2016, at 09:11, Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Now that the first changes in HV are being made towards BV 2.0, one > question is which version of HV that should be. > > For BV we are doing a major version jump from 1.1 to 2.0 as the minimum > Java version is raised. So I'm suggesting to do the same for HV and jump to > a new major, HV 6. We also may get rid of some HV-specific SPIs and replace > them with ones standardized in BV 2.0, which are breaking changes by their > nature and thus also justify the new major*. > > Assuming we agree on moving to HV 6 for BV 2.0, what should happen to the > current 5.3 family? We did an Alpha of it a while ago. Just leaving it > behind like that would look very bad IMO. So I'm inclined to release a > quick CR + Final, essentially containing what has been done prior to the BV > 2.0 work (plus maybe some more bug fixes). That should happen rather > quickly so we can focus on HV 6. > > Also WF could get that next 5.3 to contain the latest fixes of the BV 1.1 > RI. > > If there are no objections to that plan, I'd move forward with it and aim > for 5.3.CR1 release some time next week. > > Thanks, > > --Gunnar > > * ResourceBundleLocator comes to mind which would be obsolete in its > current form when splitting up the notions of message interpolation and > resource bundle retrieval > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
_______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
