Ok, I need to move forward on this and I have gotten enough affirmative feedback to ahead.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:24 PM Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote: > This is all part of the to-be-decided read/write part of the new Type > contract. I propose, as discussed in the wiki, that we have Type return > ValueExtractor and ValueBinder for read/write. So assuming that is there... > > One possible answer to your story is that OGM as a SQM interpreter and > Metamodel (persisters, etc) implementor would influence the Type and > therefore the ValueExtractor and ValueBinder. We'd just need to define the > right generic API to allow that to happen without ORM, e.g., having to jump > through a bunch of hoops to get to JDBC objects. > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 5:18 PM Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> > wrote: > >> Steve, >> >> I still need to look at the wiki page and will give more detailed >> feedback on some parts of it. >> >> One general thing coming to mind though is how support for OGM could be >> improved. On first thought I'd say the "Java side" of Type might stay as >> is, but the "SQL side" (or "datastore side") and read/write logic >> interacting with result sets etc. would have to look differently in the >> case of OGM. >> >> If this part of the story could be made pluggable somehow, than a custom >> factory of sorts in OGM could plug in its dedicated implementation of the >> "datastore side". Not sure how it'd look in practice, the implementations >> would be rather different (we don't work with ResultSet at all in OGM), so >> I suppose it might require casting to the expected subtype when working >> with Type in ORM or OGM. >> >> Currently, we completely override the Type hierarchy from ORM with a >> corresponding GridType hierarchy in OGM, but it might be possible to re-use >> many more code by just customizing the "datastore side". Plus, it'd be a >> tad more efficient for OGM, as we can skip the translation from Type to >> GridType. >> >> I might provide some more details once having studied the current >> proposal in more depth, just wanted to get out these thoughts to you. >> >> --Gunnar >> >> >> >> >> 2016-06-22 18:54 GMT+02:00 Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org>: >> >>> I started a wiki discussing the proposal for the type system redesign. >>> Let's get discussions about it starter sooner rather than later. Thanks! >>> >>> https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/wiki/6.0---Type-redesign >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
