https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-orm/pull/1411
is the minimalist change I want to do. On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:36 AM Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > Does the HQL to native query mechanic use this too? > > Indirectly. It's used for converting query parameters, if that helps. > > 2016-06-08 9:31 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org>: > > > Does the HQL to native query mechanic use this too? > > > > > On 08 Jun 2016, at 08:50, Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > > > > > JavaTypeDescriptorRegistry is used by Hibernate OGM in > > > (o.h.o.type.impl.TypeTranslatorImpl). > > > > > >> From my side, the proposed change is good, esp. if it fixes some > > existing > > > bugs. It'd lock down OGM to a specific minor of ORM, but that'll happen > > > anyways once we make use of the changes around schema tooling done in > ORM > > > 5.1. > > > > > > --Gunnar > > > > > > > > > 2016-06-07 19:49 GMT+02:00 Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org>: > > > > > >> Currently we are still working on 6.0 "on top" of 5.2, meaning that > all > > of > > >> the changes we are proposing to ORM for 6.0 are kept in a separate > > >> repo/project using ORM 5.2 as a dependency. > > >> > > >> As I work on 6.0 I have come across a change that I would like to make > > that > > >> requires that I change something in ORM proper. The specific change > is > > >> that I would like to remove static access > > >> to org.hibernate.type.descriptor.sql.SqlTypeDescriptorRegistry > > >> and org.hibernate.type.descriptor.java.JavaTypeDescriptorRegistry and > > have > > >> these scoped as part of the SessionFactory instead (technically as > part > > of > > >> the org.hibernate.metamodel.internal.MetamodelImpl associated with a > > >> SessionFactory). > > >> > > >> There are 2 ways I can go about this: > > >> > > >> 1. branch 5.2 and start 6.0 dev on master > > >> 2. make this change in master for inclusion in both 5.2 and 6.0 > > >> > > >> (2) is certainly the more convenient approach. But even beyond > > convenient, > > >> I have seen some bugs from the fact that these are statically typed - > > >> theoretically they should be scoped to the SF since the SF can mutate > > them. > > >> > > >> However making that change in 5.2 has some risks depending upon > whether > > >> apps/integrations use it. Anyone aware of any integration(s) > accessing > > >> these 2 registries? > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> hibernate-dev mailing list > > >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > hibernate-dev mailing list > > > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > hibernate-dev mailing list > > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
