Let's keep this on-list, please. Thanks! The issue, to be clear, is not auto-enabling filters.. No, the issues/concern is allowing enabled filters to be later disabled.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:34 AM Petar Tahchiev <paranoia...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm just chatting with the spring-boot guys now and they ask if hibernate > allows you to specify the filters to activate in a property file. I guess > they are interested in adding this functionality to spring-boot too. > > 2015-11-13 16:13 GMT+02:00 Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org>: > >> Well not sure I said it is valid ;) There are open questions such as the >> one I brought up. For a proposal to be valid (as in possible) all such >> questions need to have some answer. >> >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015, 7:15 AM Petar Tahchiev <paranoia...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Steve, >>> >>> and thanks for your reply. I guess I have mis-understood what the real >>> proposal was. Also, unfortunately I don't have enough knowledge of >>> hibernate's internals and like you already mentioned this change will >>> actually affect a lot of the code. My question was more to see what the >>> hibernate team thinks about such a proposal, and if there was something >>> totally against it. Now I know that it is a valid proposal and might be >>> included one day in the pipeline. >>> >>> That's ok for me :) >>> >>> >>> >>> 2015-11-13 14:37 GMT+02:00 Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org>: >>> >>> > Well I like this idea (additional flag on @Filter) better the actual >>> > request (multi-valued config setting). And what about for the >>> > @FilterDef(inition)? >>> > >>> > One concern I have is, e.g., getting a collection with a filter >>> enabled, >>> > now disabling a filter and then initializing the collection. That >>> seems >>> > like the outcome (the initialization will not be filtered) will not be >>> what >>> > was probably intended. Filters were designed to be disabled by >>> default and >>> > only enable-able; so a change like this will challenge assumptions >>> > throughout the code. >>> > >>> > Is this something you are volunteering to work on? >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:25 AM Petar Tahchiev <paranoia...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hello, >>> >> >>> >> here's a 6-year old issue: >>> >> >>> >> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-3815 >>> >> >>> >> That suggests to add another attribute on the @Filter annotation >>> >> (something >>> >> like activeByDefault=true). Can we have your oppinion on it? >>> >> -- >>> >> Regards, Petar! >>> >> Karlovo, Bulgaria. >>> >> --- >>> >> Public PGP Key at: >>> >> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x19658550C3110611 >>> >> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF 55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611 >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> hibernate-dev mailing list >>> >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, Petar! >>> Karlovo, Bulgaria. >>> --- >>> Public PGP Key at: >>> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x19658550C3110611 >>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF 55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>> >> > > > -- > Regards, Petar! > Karlovo, Bulgaria. > --- > Public PGP Key at: > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x19658550C3110611 > Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF 55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611 > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
