Sorry hit send too soon :( Anyway.. I assume it is because we know this information from commit history?
As far as the ORM one, I propose a similar change. Any objections? On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote: > As far as the file header, I have often thought of condensing our ORM one > so that is awesome information. For my own curiosity did Richard give you > a reason that the copyright statement is not necessary? > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> > wrote: > >> On 18 May 2015 at 15:23, Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org> wrote: >> > Note that custom checkstyle rule implementations does not fare well >> with IDE checkstyle rules enforcement. >> > I can't make it reliably work on search and OGM. >> >> As far as I remember the problem was related with having the >> customisations as part of the project which is being built. >> I'd hope one day we could publish a common set of rules by releasing >> the custom as an independent project, consumed by all. We could try >> that already for some projects, and see if the others catch up >> eventually? They don't even have to use the same XML so there is some >> room for customizing which rules exactly each project wants to >> enforce. >> >> I'm not sure if that will resolve your problem but it's worth trying; >> it could also slightly speed up the builds by a couple of seconds, as >> you wouldn't have to rebuild the checkstyle module each time. >> _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
