Yes I think a 5.x supporting ORM 5 would be my preference. I sort of remember 
us discussing that option in AMS.

> On 29 Apr 2015, at 12:42, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> wrote:
> 
> Ok so we have all been wrong, but also we couldn't wait.
> Looking forward, does this mean you'd prefer to upgrade to ORM 5 in a
> minor version of Hibernate Search?
> 
> Sanne
> 
> On 29 April 2015 at 10:07, Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org> wrote:
>> I liked and still do like the planet alignment to make the major a platform 
>> signal. But when we discussed it, you all were against me.
>> 
>>> On 22 Apr 2015, at 10:41, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Just a heads up: I'm not seeing the question from the subject often enough.
>>> 
>>> In fact, I only see it when I suggest to upgrade when helping some
>>> user. It's like they are very surprised "no way, I didn't think that
>>> was possible?!"
>>> 
>>> I think I've been hammering this information in each and every release
>>> blog, but apparently an assumption on major versions needing to be
>>> aligned is stronger.
>>> 
>>> I guess we should embrace that? We can upgrade a minor of Hibernate
>>> Search to use Hibernate ORM 5 when it comes, that will fix the
>>> alignment of planets.
>>> 
>>> Still, we also had hopes for a quick version 6 ..
>>> 
>>> Just some thoughts.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sanne
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> 


_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev

Reply via email to