On Mon 2015-02-23 9:15, Gunnar Morling wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for grooming the backlog and preparing these releases! > > I'm curious how the weekly release scheme is going to work out. In the last > two sprints we created none (although I thought we wanted to release HS?) > and one (HV, as planned) release. Planning for four releases now may be > over-stretching it a bit, esp. when splitting up powers as we do in the > first week. I would have planned for 4.1.2 and a 4.2 release.
Let's see how much we can crank this week. You guys keep telling me doing a release does not take much time per se. 4.1.2 is easy I think. The challenge is 4.2.0.Alpha1, but let's decide later this week and code first. > As you say, it's too many issues, we will not be able to do them all. > Personally, I like a realistic schedule more, IMO it gives you a better > sense of achievement if you actually managed to tackle what you had > planned. Now we'll more likely get the feeling that we failed to do half of > the things planned (as we know that's expected, still I find it > sub-optimal). My problem was, when do I stop ? 1 issue, 7 issues, 42 issues ? Let's code and see how far we are end of each week. > > The 4.1.2/4.2 release split make sense. It may be a good idea to either > pull you, Emmanuel, or Sanne (which I wouldn't count as a newbie in terms > of OGM) over to 4.2 issues at some stage, depending on the progress we make > with the respective backlogs. Yes that was my idea as well but the email was getting too long. _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
