I'll try avoiding a flame war here... especially as I'm a Terracotta employee and working on Ehcache. That being said, the FAQ says: "I just built both EHCache (1.2-beta4) and JCS (1.2.7.0) from head, (...)", where 1.3.0 was released over 7 years ago, I guess "just" has relative semantics here. Latest stable JCS release is 5 years old now too, so whether you still manage to find the Ehcache perf results, or are reading the ones on the JCS website... there are, how would I best put it, ... utterly out of date.
On a side note, if the 2.0 release will be 107 compliant, I have a JSR-107 caching provider more or less done (missing a couple of things for the read-write strategy around collections), but I'd love to test with that too then (not necessarily perf only though here). Anyways, random biased thoughts :) Alex On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Petar, > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Petar Tahchiev <paranoia...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I would really like to give apache commons jcs a spin (the FAQ says > > performancewise it's faster than EHCache) > > I don't know JCS but I find it funny they criticize the fact that > Ehcache published an old benchmark and that they still have a very old > one in their FAQ. > > It might be interesting to have more recent performance information > comparing the latest versions of both before deciding if it's really > worth it. > > -- > Guillaume > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > -- Alex Snaps <alex.sn...@gmail.com> Principal Software Engineer - Terracotta http://twitter.com/alexsnaps http://about.me/alexsnaps http://www.devoxx4kids.org/quebec/ _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
