Hi Hardy, Thanks for your feedback. I'll see what I can do next week about it.
-- Guillaume On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Hardy Ferentschik <ha...@hibernate.org> wrote: > Hi, > > took a while to respond, but I tend to agree that @ContainedIn would be good > enough. > I don’t think a new annotation would make things clearer. As discussed > before, the main > issue was that the original intention was that @ContainedIn always requires > an @IndexedEmbedded. > It just happened to work also without and during the refactoring the > behaviour was changed to > match the original intentions. > > The important thing is to make sure that the documentation and javadocs are > documenting the > behaviour properly and consistently. > > So +1 for getting the old behaviour back > > —Hardy > > > > > > On 20 Jan 2014, at 11:08, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@hibernate.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Following the discussion about releasing 5 sooner rather than later, I >> wanted to point out that we still have to take a decision about >> HSEARCH-1580: >> - either commit in 5 the fix we committed to 4.x and update the >> documentation; >> - or work on defining another concept. >> >> I don't have a strong opinion about what we should do but I have a >> strong one about doing something before we release 5 :). >> >> References: >> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1580 >> https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HSEARCH-1573 >> >> Feedback welcome. >> >> (sorry for the long silence - busy months...) >> >> -- >> Guillaume >> _______________________________________________ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
