On 28 March 2014 11:37, Hardy Ferentschik <ha...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > On 28 Jan 2014, at 12:16, Emmanuel Bernard <emman...@hibernate.org> wrote: > >> We could use either a different annotation or a flag >> >> @ContainedIn(someVerySmartName=SomeVerySmartValue) > > I was also wondering whether a whole new annotation would make sense, but > nothing intuitive > came to mind right away. I guess @ContainedIn cold work. It is just that we > need to make clear > what it means and how it behaves.
+1 Since 4.4 is the last one supporting a wide an popular range of Hibernate versions and application server versions, it's totally possible that we'll be making more bugifx releases if the need shows up. However - I might not have fully grasped this yet - but I'm thinking that this is a feature request and not a bugfix that should be hastily applied on 4.4. Guillaume, I suspect you might be a happier user if you would keep using a more bleeding edge version, so to catch any such thing earlier rather than the day before you go in production. I can only promise you that the migration to 5.0 will be a nightmare if you don't follow along in small iterations :-( Sanne > > —Hardy > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
