On 26 Jan 2014, at 21:09, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote:
> I really like the general approach you did in metamodel. In fact, even
> though I heavily refactored most of that package, the way annotated members
> are found is largely unchanged.
>
> But specifically, take Sanne's example. Access(PROPERTY) for the class.
> Then for one attribute they want field *access* (runtime). How would you see
> that? Like I said initially, I think there are 2 potentially valid ways to
> support this.
>
> First,
>
> @Entity
> @Access(AccessType.PROPERTY)
> public class Course3 {
> @Id
> @GeneratedValue
> @Access(AccessType.FIELD)
> private long id;
> ...
>
> public long getId() {
> return id;
> }
> ...
> }
>
> This approach gives credence to the passage I have been quoting here: "It is
> not permitted to specify a field as Access(PROPERTY) or a property as
> Access(FIELD)".
>
>
> Second,
>
> @Entity
> @Access(AccessType.PROPERTY)
> public class Course3 {
> private long id;
> ...
>
> @Id
> @GeneratedValue
> @Access(AccessType.FIELD)
> public long getId() {
> return id;
> }
> ...
> }
>
> I prefer the first one.
I prefer #1 as well
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
