Well we are in the position we are in already from one person making this determination ;)
So that is the situation I am trying to avoid. As this thread is showing, we all have different readings/interpretations of the same spec passages. It is good to come to a consensus. On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Hardy Ferentschik <ha...@hibernate.org>wrote: > > On 26 Jan 2014, at 20:16, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > > Ok, but... its still a good spring board to discuss this topic which is > strangely unclear and murky in terms of what we do and do not support. > > Sure. I am just saying, we are discussing a wrong test. When I was > implementing the JPA @Access rules, I never had the intentions to support > the mapping which started the this thread. In my interoperation of the JPA > spec it is wrong. It should either thrown an exception (in fact I thought > there > used to be some checks which would actually do that) or if anything just > ignored the annotation. > > --Hardy > > > > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
