There are two problems, I am not sure why it uses "nicknames" as the property name, I don't think that's the actual default value in JPA, is it? Otherwise, I agree with you, we could simplify it except when the collection is keyed or indexed. At this stage you need to store the key or the index next to the value.
About collection&&element, the bug is already opened https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/OGM-251 Hasn't been addressed yet :( Emmanuel On 12 Mar 2014, at 10:21, Gunnar Morling wrote: > Hi, > > I just did some testing around @ElementCollection using MongoDB. A > collection of a basic type results in the following persistent format > of > the embedding entity: > > { > "_id": "17457a47-abfc-4fb7-955e-17acb0b49808", > "nicknames": [ > { "nicknames": "idrA" }, > { "nicknames": "day[9]" } > ] > } > > Is there any reason why we don't use this instead: > > { > "_id": "17457a47-abfc-4fb7-955e-17acb0b49808", > "nicknames": [ > "idrA", > "day[9]" > ] > } > > For non-basic, embeddable types it looks like this: > > { > "_id": "17457a47-abfc-4fb7-955e-17acb0b49808", > "homeAddress": [ > { > "homeAddress.collection&&element.city": "Paris", > "homeAddress.collection&&element.country": "France", > "homeAddress.collection&&element.street1": "1 avenue des > Champs Elysees", > "homeAddress.collection&&element.street2": null, > "postal_code": "75007" > } > ] > } > > Is this "collection&&element" style intended, or could we use the > simple > property name as keys here ("postal_code" is specified explicitly via > @Column)? > > I can file issues in JIRA (and take a look at some point), but wanted > to be > sure I'm not missing something here. > > Thanks, > > --Gunnar > _______________________________________________ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
