But you're OK with the following instead?
@Entity
@Proxy(proxyClass=Employee.class)
class EmployeeImpl implements Employee {
...
}
?
See I find that (^^) less clear and less concise.
What's the basis for your gut to say -1? Because it "breaks" from JPA?
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:37 AM, Hardy Ferentschik <ha...@hibernate.org>wrote:
>
> On 9 Jan 2014, at 18:31, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote:
>
> > Then we had expanded the previous discussion to look at the more general
> > case... interface based models. Imo, the best way to map the above model
> > would be:
> >
> > @Entity
> > interface Employee {
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > Yes, this deviates from JPA which explicitly says that only classes can
> be
> > annotated. The question is whether we think its worthy of a "vendor
> > extension".
>
> Not sure whether I am a big fan of this. As a first gut feeling I would
> give it a -1
>
>
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
