A forum user had some trouble with the current HQL parser: https://forum.hibernate.org/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=1030515
And since I've been slow to react, he went ahead and created a JIRA; I think he's right about this, still then - as you can see from his latest post - he felt unsure on where to open it, and it became HQLPARSER-35. Since this is about the current parser, he's probably in the wrong place, and there is a risk that the ORM team won't notice timely? but I don't think I can blame him as it's probably confusing. My first impulse was to jump on JIRA and see if I could enable some big fat warning on HQLPARSER to explain the difference, but actually maybe it's better if the ORM team could start looking at new issues in there as _actual_ issues? I'm thinking that while HQLPARSER matures, it should also incorporate fixes/tests happening on the mainline parser: if there was a single place to track defects of both I could "catch up" on ORM improvements when working on it. So... should I move HQLPARSER-35 to HHH, or shall we leave it there ? Maybe better to duplicate the issues? I'm voting for duplication, as they require either a fix or at least a test applied to both projects, and we probably want to keep lifecycle independent for a while longer. Sanne _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
