On 13 January 2014 11:01, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sanne, > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> wrote: >> Then, you can remove all the previous workarounds too: given we'd be >> removing the re-attach processing and all the proxy re-attaching code, >> it might even win you something in performance.. I don't know that for >> sure, but seems worth to try out? > > I agree that the separation of work between 2 phases seems to be the > root of all evil and we might be able to simplify a lot of code by > removing this. > > I'm kinda swamped atm but I would like to take a look at this in > february if it's OK with you? I will probably need some guidance.
Of course I'm ok with that. If any I was under the impression you needed a solution urgently; if that's the case, be aware I suspect this could be a trivial change. -- Sanne _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
